![]() This is better explained in Arkenfox's wiki hopefully you can understand what they've said if not me. The only reason Librewolf scores better on Panopticlick is because a large number of people have checked default Librewolf, and almost nobody has checked Firefox with the exact set of 8 addons you were using at the time. Panopticlick can only compare your browser profile with other people who have used Panopticlick, which is a tiny and specific corner of the internet at large. No idea what that means.Īlso, you should not trust sites like that. I see now that this has been changed to a thanks to pyllyukko and a section clarifying that they are not directly using arkenfox, but "endeavor to keep up to date with" Arkenfox. LibreWolf's documentation claimed that it was a fork of Firefox with the optimizations and security of user.js files from both arkenfox and pyllyukko built in. That way the Ubuntu devs too will look at their code which will increase the legitimacy even more. As you know if your browser is your main interface to the Internet so the Librewolf team must make some effort to convince the Ubuntu team so that they add Librewolf to their official repos. So as a Lubuntu user I am not sure how I am suppose to install Librewolf. I am paranoid about security so I rarely install anything outside of the official repos but still if Librewolf creates a PPA and mentions it on their official homepage I will think about trusting it. I mean if you are an Arch user you have to install it from AUR but if you are a Debian/Ubuntu user I am not sure how to install it. I don't understand the approach Librewolf has taken. I mean besides Firefox there's Chrome but that's even more worse. >They wont bother until people notice they are misleading people who think its private by defaultīut people don't have a choice. Especially if you want something like Containers, Firefox is unique in its hardenability. TL DR - I would recommend configuring Firefox for security rather than trusting a Chromium fork out of the box. There's also LibreWolf, which is basically a fork of Firefox that includes the arkenfox stuff already mostly set up. Its main goal is to maintain a well-hardened Firefox configuration through the use of a user.js file, but the Github wiki there has lots of valuable information about anti-fingerprinting measures you can take. If you are interested in anti-fingerprinting measures, check out the arkenfox project. People visiting eff.org are probably more privacy conscious than the average user, so the results will be biased. Humanity had fought fights for rights like this, and they have always succeeded, no matter how long it took.Ĭontainers are unique to Firefox, so if you want anything that relies on them, you'll need to use a Firefox-based browser (not a Chromium fork like Brave).Īlso, those fingerprint-checking sites like the one you linked are inherently unreliable - the sample they compare your uniqueness to is based on others who have used the site before you, rather than users across the internet as a whole. I think this fight for privacy is going to be long, but we can win this fight. If you can convince one person, and that person convinces another, it will form a bigger chain of people. It's just a matter of time when it can compete with ms office head to head.Ĭonvincing most of the people about privacy is the hardest part. Libreoffice is getting improved day by day. With some help, you can also install older versions of ms office on linux. But, you can use, which is the web version of MS Office. Yes, for some people, libreoffice dosen't work. A project called librewolf attempts to deliver the user a firefox browser with privacy tweaks. No mordern browser even comes close to it. But, hardened firefox (firefox with privacy tweaks) is the best of the best in mordern browser category. Yes, firefox is not good in terms of privacy either. Also, i would recommend linux mint or manjaro to someone who is new to linux world. There are many, like linux mint, based on ubuntu, which usually remove the privacy-invading stuff. But ubuntu is not the only linux distribution around. Yes, ubuntu is not that good in terms of privacy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |